Facts: Rolando Salvador was proclaimed winner in a mayoralty race in May
14, 2001 elections. His opponent, Romeo Estrella, filed before (RTC) an
election protest which consequently annulled Salvador‘s proclamation and
declared Estrella as the duly elected mayor and eventually issued writ of
execution. While Salvador filed a petition for certiorari before the COMELEC,
raffled to the Second Division thereof, Estrella moved for inhibition of
Commissioner Ralph Lantion, but a Status Quo Ante Order was issued. However,
Commissioner Lantion voluntarily inhibited himself and designated another
Commissioner to substitute him. The Second Division, with the new judge,
affirmed with modifications the RTC decision and declared Estrella as the duly
elected mayor. Salvador filed a Motion for Reconsideration which was elevated
to the COMELEC En Banc, in which this time, Commissioner Lantion participated
by virtue of Status Quo Ante Order issued by the COMELEC En Banc. He said that
as agreed upon, while he may not participate in the Division deliberations, he
will vote when the case is elevated to COMELEC En Banc. Hence, Estrella filed a
Petition for Certiorari before the Supreme Court.
ISSUE: Whether a COMELEC Commissioner who inhibited himself in
Division deliberations may participate in its En Banc deliberation.
HELD: The Status Quo Ante Order dated November 5, 2003 issued
by the COMELEC En Banc is nullified. Commissioner Lantion‘s voluntary piecemeal
inhibition cannot be countenanced. Nowhere in the COMELEC Rules does it allow a
Commissioner to voluntarily inhibit with reservation. To allow him to
participate in the En Banc proceedings when he previously inhibited himself in
the Division is, absent any satisfactory justification, not only judicially
unethical but legally improper and absurd. Since Commissioner Lantion could not
participate and vote in the issuance of the questioned order, thus leaving
three (3) members concurring therewith, the necessary votes of four (4) or
majority of the members of the COMELEC was not attained. The order thus failed
to comply with the number of votes necessary for the pronouncement of a
decision or order.
No comments:
Post a Comment